FellowTraveler
Well-Known Member
Air density increase always make more power that's good.Both my pickup and my Burb ran better in the cold. Best was mid-30's temp and foggy mornings. It was like Mother Nature's charge cooler and WMI all in one!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Air density increase always make more power that's good.Both my pickup and my Burb ran better in the cold. Best was mid-30's temp and foggy mornings. It was like Mother Nature's charge cooler and WMI all in one!
My truck loves the mid 30's as well.Both my pickup and my Burb ran better in the cold. Best was mid-30's temp and foggy mornings. It was like Mother Nature's charge cooler and WMI all in one!
So interestingly, while I was talking to Joel about some other stuff he said, "Something else I just remembered that I wanted to mention. The puff limiter is designed for the Ford DB2. We have used them on GM applications with one note. The cold start solenoid terminal connector will foul your throttle shaft. This will leave you with two options: Delete the cold start solenoid and just use a nut and bolt with the supplied insulator to block it off. With the extra fuel provided I think you will warm up sufficiently without the extra advance. If you go this route be sure to use lock tite on the hardware to prevent it vibrating loose. The other option would be to cut the end off of the cold start solenoid terminal and shorten your attachments accordingly and perhaps clearance the throttle shaft slightly to make room."
I'm glad he mentioned that because I definitely had clearance issues between the cold advance solenoid and the throttle arm. It would be super tough to make it clear the throttle arm so I went with the deletion route. I installed a Phillips head screw with the head facing out to try to gain as much clearance as possible. I also installed Red Loctite on the threads so that nut will NOT come off. During test fit I found that the arm was still rubbing the screw head so I used a dremel to grind some clearance into the head. Even then I had to bend the throttle arm away from the pump to get final clearance! Getting that taken care of took a bit of time. Then I started looking at the clearance of the aneroid to the intake and the barb was pretty tight to the plenum. It's a super small thread on that (1/16" NPT?) so there was no way I was finding an elbow last night. So I trimmed the end of the fitting just past the barb. Unfortunately I only got a "before" pic and not an "after" pic, but I think you can picture what I did. That gained me about 1/8". It's a tight fit but it doesn't kink and since the hose is under pressure and not vacuum that will help keep the hose open.
I had to take the intercooler, AC compressor, coolant crossover and fast idle solenoid off to get access to the pump, so in all the job took about 2.5 hours to complete. I neglected to do the initial setup that Hypermax recommends which is: turn the aneroid in until it starts lowering idle, then back it out 1 turn.
So despite that, here are my initial impressions: I can still make a pretty good cloud if I tromp on it before boost comes on. However just going up hills in a high gear it is much more civilized. Also, it has turned the throttle into a much more linear progression. Before, not much off idle I could really pull strong, now I have to give it more throttle to feel that. That makes sense to me since the puff limiter holds back the fuel valve until boost is up. I did another 0-70-ish run just going around the block. This time I had my brother and a more or less full tank of fuel in the truck, so about 400 pounds more? My butt dyno said it was slower, but that's just my butt dyno. I'll do some actual testing to see how it really compares once I have it fully set. If it operates how designed, it should not affect overall performance, in fact if anything it should improve it because it doesn't flood the engine with fuel at the initial hit of the throttle. I am going to email Joel and get his thoughts on the travel of the aneroid versus how much the governor arm travels and make sure that it couldn't actually restrict overall travel. That's just a side note, I have no verification at all that it actually is slower, it was one hit with more weight based on a butt dyno!
The other thing I might try is adding a mechanical, click-type wastegate actuator to the supply line. It seems that if it limited fuel until about 8-10 psi instead of the 5-ish psi that it limits it to right now that maybe I'd puff less. They're cheap enough (like $20) that it would probably be a worthwhile experiment.
Yes, Conestoga absolutely would have installed the Puff Limiter. In fact, that is typically their preference, but he didn't object to me installing it myself since I showed I had some mechanical capability. I wanted to install it myself for the purposes of testing and to save some money up front. I wasn't 100% sure that I would need it when I conceived this project, so I didn't want to spend the extra money. But if I did need it, I wanted to see a before and after comparison of how it reacted and share that. That's why I didn't have them install it. Once I get it tweaked I will do a full comparison for you guys. If I don't lose any full output power, yet it reduces light throttle smoke like it has so far, then I would call it a success, but it by no means appears to kill all smoke. However, in talking with Joel yesterday about some other stuff he mentioned this: The Stanadyne starting fuel spec for a DB2 is 35cc/1000 strokes. Most of their Street level pumps make 50-70cc/1000 strokes. The standard Omega makes 80-100cc/1000 strokes of starting fuel. MY PUMP makes 130cc/1000 strokes at 150 (yes, 1 5 0) rpm! So even if the aneroid is limiting the fueling some, this pump is still making a lot of fuel.
The reason that topic came up is that I'm getting some misfiring and gray smoke at start up, sometimes worse than others. I thought I had some air intrusion into my fuel system, but he's wondering if it's just the engine trying to clean up the extra fuel from cranking. I'm playing around with glow plug time to see if I can affect it. I also installed some good clear tubing on the return last night so I can start keeping track of any air bubbles.
I will continue to fine tune and document this week. It will be a long process because I want to change just one thing at a time, but I will do it since it will be the most meaningful and helpful. BUT, it's killing me to not mess with the trans tuning - I REALLY want to start raising my shift points!!
More soon.
View attachment 47929 View attachment 47930 View attachment 47931 View attachment 47932 View attachment 47933 View attachment 47934 View attachment 47935 View attachment 47936
If you need any other pics, I'm happy to oblige WW. Joel told me that they have made the cold advance work with the Puff Limiter and I'm sure I could too with a little effort. It would be a lot easier with the pump on a bench so you can see clearances better, but it could be done on the engine. He also mentioned the possibility of a solenoid with a remote terminal that could be run out of the top of the housing rather than the side. I haven't heard if he has had any luck with that or not though - I think he's been busy enough with other stuff that he's just never gotten around to it.Finally a picture showing if and how the Hypermax puff limiter clears a 6.5 intake! I will have to ask Conestoga to play with one and see if they can keep the cold advance in a custom pump one day.
Your 1/4 mile time, aside of it being HOT out here on the strip, would run with my past (good riddance!) tuned Trailblazer SS having a 6500 RPM redline, lighter at 4,496 to 4,663 lbs, stock 395 HP and 400 lb ft of torque from the Corvette LS2 GM hurriedly dropped in. It would do 14 seconds flat at 98 MPH when it was 100 degrees out. That is when I could keep the lemon it was out of the shop. Eaton called for dyno oil on the posi and GM's zero maintenance blind stupidity kept putting in synthetic oil through several oil revisions. Never seen that many rear end rebuilds under warranty before = lemon law...
The Trailblazer SS only towed the parts route a week before the weak transmission vaporized while I was doing an engine swap on Patch...
Oooh a built 6.5 close by?? Cool!Just started mine in the same weather ( 40 miles north)after12 hours. 18:1 motor. No smoke. Without the magic button, I would've smoked out the whole neighborhood.
Oooh, I love a list!!Few things:
1. Omg what is that white stuff- radio active fallout?
2. Never noticed the rims- cool. Man thats a good looking rig.
3. Sure cranks over nice and fast. Starts well, I will
agree more glow time would help it more. A draw back of lower compression ratio.
4. Your truck spins its tires all by itself, you dont have to blame it on the snow.
5. You sound like a very calm, collected guy. With your build I kinda expected someone that spoke fast,hyperactive, and all excited.
Mine's 17.5:1, but was pretty uneventfull starting at 8 degrees.
It's a direct injected duramax, so a bit newer technology.How much advance do you have programmed in at that temp? Any other tricks in the programming that helps with cold weather starts?
That’s why it's called the Frankenburban, Nate!It's a direct injected duramax, so a bit newer technology.
Yeah I get that, I just figured since you posted your cold start video here that there was maybe something that could be gleaned from it. That in addition to your tuning knowledge, I thought it would be interesting to know what was in the tuning files for cold starting it.It's a direct injected duramax, so a bit newer technology.