KBcoltcompany
Diesel Head, Patriot
Tim, I don't even have the words to say in response to this post.........freakin' awesome........thanks for explaining what I have been thinking about all these other "alternative" fuels, namely used motor oil or ATF. I work too hard to pay for my expensive truck to test it on different fuels and "see what happens", but some will do what they may. Maybe they'll run 4ever, maybe not. I am guessing not. Cheers......:cheers2:The other part not mentioned as of yet is filtration can remove solids, but it does nothing for the chemistry of the used motor oil, yes grandpa & uncle billy ran tractors & truck for years on used oil, those were low psi injection and "dumb injection systems' we are talking 20,000 psi here in DMAX trucks, ever hear of extrude hone, they put grit into solution and polish parts (remove metal) now it's gonna take longer with minute solids but over time it's gonna degrade, plus your 2 micron filter a nominal 2 micron or an absolute one?
That is the solids part of the equation, now we have water and PH , just through normal condensation (& humidity) absorbtion you get water in your oil, also any trace coolant leakage from cooling system making it to your oil, heavy metals from normal wear and tear for moving engine parts, detrergents & additve in oil all combine to make a weak acid in your oil, (Bio-D makers treat their brew to proper Ph for a reason) now what comes from YOUR truck is probaly okay, but just what other crud might be in collected oil from elsewhere, IMO saving benefit does not justify the risk, and yes us 6.5 guys don't have high psi fuel systems, but our Achillies heel is the optic sensor/disk.
Until we got something saying otherwise I have to defer to mfr of fuel systems that used motor oil, trans or used anything that hasn't been properly blended for use as bio-D ain't good for longevity. Do what you will, IMO I would not be doing it to my "old 6.5" even less ambitious to do it on a common rail high psi, high $$$$ fuel system/engine. yes we all experiment but "wild catting" vs scientific study IMO you get a lot of wrong guesses before you get to the desired outcome, I don't have the $$$ to go SWAGging on my ride, (SWAG Scientific Wild Ass Guess).
Oh before you go saying TD is just grousing, I used to test/treat fuel 621,000 gal for ship propulsion/power generation use, and 40,000 gal for helicopters (never had a helo crash or ship quit moving when I was "Oil King" musta been doing something rite) been a while since I had to do that on regular basis; but I do got a piece of paper somewhere when I graduated from propulsion & aviation fuels school (top of class from that school BTW) that says I'm qualified to opine on things like fuel quality.
But I still have to be cognizant of fuel used in turbines I work on and fuel properties are something we are very keen on, we get many turbines that fail because of poor fuel issues, hot spots burning combustors/turbine blades because fuel nozzles (injectors) no longer atomize they direct spray solid streams of fuel at only 700-800 psi at max power, (imagine what a gunked DMax injector at 20,000 psi does to piston tops) .
Granted turbines fire at a lot higher firing temp than our Diesels do but junk in fuel has same negative effects in any I.C.E. , I would not add any junk period to my fuel, clean new oil 2cycle would be okay; but heck it's hard enough to find quality fuel from fuel stops, and you are voluntariliy adding crud to yours, ain't smart IMO, but as others have said do what you will.
Then there is the whole "legal/taxation aspect" we won't go there that is P&R topic; Al Gore et als in tree hugging crowd can K.M.A. I don't believe the global warming hoax, nor the obscence profits being made while "saving the earth" by "green elitists".