robzombie4551
robzombie4551
Thanks Ferm for putting up and comparing the various vids. You have it wrong on my HP tune though. I get to sixty in 8 seconds and to 100 in about 16 or 18 if I remember, I haven't looked at the vids in awhile.
My whole point of putting the vids together and posting them wasn't to show the times [although that is one yardstick to measure by] it was to show how well the HX40 performs from a stock tune all the way up to whatever fueling and timing curve you throw at it. That way you could buy a turbo one time and as your mods got better, more fueling,exhaust or whatever you knew that the turbo was versatile enough to cover many mods/improvements and still have great drivability and performance in all rpm ranges, especially off idle.
Also the tests showed how the ATT doesn't perform well at all levels of tunes from stock to whatever you throw at it. Now if you're Tom and have an OBD1 truck and can make your own tune/s anytime you want it would be fine as you could dial the turbo in to what it likes.
The OBDII crowd doesn't have that luxury and will have to reflash the computer god knows how many times before it's what they like.
You run a tuner and know that each tune will give you different results but it also doesn't mean that you have the best tune [just better or worse] than what you had before.
The HX40 out performs the ATT on every level [especially down low] but I will retract the POS statement only because that is my opinion and I'm entitled to that.
Others may/will disagree with that opinion until they find something they try other than stock or the ATT which might lead them to think the say way.
What I'm trying to say is the ATT is just to narrow in the range that it performs well for me and there are many other turbos out there that perform better,not just the one I'm running.
My whole point of putting the vids together and posting them wasn't to show the times [although that is one yardstick to measure by] it was to show how well the HX40 performs from a stock tune all the way up to whatever fueling and timing curve you throw at it. That way you could buy a turbo one time and as your mods got better, more fueling,exhaust or whatever you knew that the turbo was versatile enough to cover many mods/improvements and still have great drivability and performance in all rpm ranges, especially off idle.
Also the tests showed how the ATT doesn't perform well at all levels of tunes from stock to whatever you throw at it. Now if you're Tom and have an OBD1 truck and can make your own tune/s anytime you want it would be fine as you could dial the turbo in to what it likes.
The OBDII crowd doesn't have that luxury and will have to reflash the computer god knows how many times before it's what they like.
You run a tuner and know that each tune will give you different results but it also doesn't mean that you have the best tune [just better or worse] than what you had before.
The HX40 out performs the ATT on every level [especially down low] but I will retract the POS statement only because that is my opinion and I'm entitled to that.
Others may/will disagree with that opinion until they find something they try other than stock or the ATT which might lead them to think the say way.
What I'm trying to say is the ATT is just to narrow in the range that it performs well for me and there are many other turbos out there that perform better,not just the one I'm running.
