Husker6.5
135' diagonal 16:9HD, 25KW sound!
No, @Tombrewster421, what I said was all the 6.2 and 6.5NA powered vehicles in Army inventory that I had experience with when I got out in '98 had the bullet-proof TH400 in them - be they CUCVs or M993/HMMMV variations - not the POS 4L80E. I have absolutely no idea why they would put the failure-prone 4L80E into the HMMMV family of vehicles, with the EMP/electrical system failure-vunerable TCM, unless it was either due to some under the table kickback to somebody in procurement (possible), some need to get more top end speed (possible) out of them, or better fuel mileage numbers to make logistical support easier in SW Asia (also possible), but from a reliability and maintenance support standpoint it was a poor decision - as @Will L.'s post above bears out.