JayTheCPA
Well-Known Member
Do agree that the report shows where TriboDyne has good results.
From the 'not knocking, just saying' perspective, it also does not seem that it is 100% apples-to-apples. Specifically, I'd expect to see direct comparison of same weights where the sample population was a bit all-over the place.
Given that NASCAR and HHRA are using TriboDyne is the stronger indicator of success as I cannot see where these organizations will use something (especially more expensive) without a clear cost benefit. Then again (and admit that I do not have direct knowledge), do not see where these organizations will use the lube for long.
Another factor (where time will tell) is the ability to suspend soot.
When it comes time to buy another batch of oil, will circle back on this and see how it is 'burning-in'
From the 'not knocking, just saying' perspective, it also does not seem that it is 100% apples-to-apples. Specifically, I'd expect to see direct comparison of same weights where the sample population was a bit all-over the place.
Given that NASCAR and HHRA are using TriboDyne is the stronger indicator of success as I cannot see where these organizations will use something (especially more expensive) without a clear cost benefit. Then again (and admit that I do not have direct knowledge), do not see where these organizations will use the lube for long.
Another factor (where time will tell) is the ability to suspend soot.
When it comes time to buy another batch of oil, will circle back on this and see how it is 'burning-in'
Last edited: