bowtiebutler956
Active Member
The 12559338 is a 190 for the single thermostat 6.5's, just like I have pictured above. Its not a 195, it says 88 Celsius on it, which is 190.What is 12559338 for then? A double t-stat housing?
Matt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 12559338 is a 190 for the single thermostat 6.5's, just like I have pictured above. Its not a 195, it says 88 Celsius on it, which is 190.What is 12559338 for then? A double t-stat housing?
So the double housing has one stat with a blocker on the bottom and one without?
No, the dual thermostats don't have the blocker on either of them. I believe they use a restriction in the bypass to compensate.
Matt
gms idea was the dual stats flowed enough that they didnt need a bypass blocker. It has been found that they needed restrictor to help get full rad flow. This is why heath reccomends the single now, and sells a restrictor for the duals. Gm added a blocker when they made the duramax as they had learned there lesson from the 6.5.
The housing design for the dual does not allow for bypass blocking thermostats, it requires higher flow stats installing lower flow stats could come back and bite you in the a__. The dual system requires a restricter in in the bypass hose to get the most from the cooling system. As a single thermostat housing goes I've not seen any that meets the flow requirements of the newer HO pumps, I had asked if there is a difference in their design to allow for more flow never got an clear answer.Has anyone found a good restricted thermostat for the dual tstat system? Is the duramax dual the same as the 6.5? Any suggestions.
Yep that missing tab directs flow up to cooling stack GMT400 that had HD towing had tabs on both sides to direct the air from the bumper holes upwards.Yes, there is a part missing. Rubber mud flaps cut up do wonders there...
The housing design for the dual does not allow for bypass blocking thermostats, it requires higher flow stats installing lower flow stats could come back and bite you in the a__. The dual system requires a restricter in in the bypass hose to get the most from the cooling system. As a single thermostat housing goes I've not seen any that meets the flow requirements of the newer HO pumps, I had asked if there is a difference in their design to allow for more flow never got an clear answer.
Thanks for the reply good info.There is a clear answer and it it that it takes the two thermostats to get the highest flow. And you still have to restrict the bypass to cover GM ongoing cooling system screw ups. Further there are concerns of higher block pressure with a single t-stat and a HO water pump pushing out freeze plugs.
In my experience running a single T-stat and a HO pump the Single T-stat was just fine. Extended high RPM means my freeze plugs were very tight... Really concerned - run a lower pressure cap. 14 PSI or make sure you get a 15, not 16 PSI cap the parts stores hand you all the time. The water pump just doesn't generate that much pressure. EVANS 0 PSI coolant is a option.
Only when I went really crazy with the spool valve did I reach the limit of a single T-stat in AZ 121 degree weather. Spool valve traps more heat in the engine. With a better turbo the cooling needs are less. Even so running a GM3 hard the single t-stat worked fine with a KD low temp fan clutch.
Again the clear answer is there isn't a need for the dual t-stat setup unless you are building more power than 99% of us. I can think of 3 members would would benefit form this and that doesn't include me as I sold the 1995 that would have. It's now in a colder climate and doesn't need it now I expect.
I wanted to run a single on the 96 and had one bolted on ready to go. Ran into a problem in that with a DB2 the throttle bracket was in the way. Had to go back to my old set up were I used a dual with the neck turned upside down.