- Staff
- #21
The Mechanical DB2's appear to already do this RPM timing variance and run well with the ATT. It is night and day the 1993 vs. my 1995. Enough that I have considered a DB2 conversion on this alone then there is the PMD costs... Even on the experimental 'Slim' tune the precups mess me up for smoke. Stock tune even smokes. However there is a big difference you can feel between tunes out there and what you and Slim are working on. The throttle is more progressive over the range of the pedal. With the BD valve I think I feel the timing change used to spool the ATT as a flat spot. (Got to pin that down more.) Light throttle around town the BD valve has cleaned it up a lot on all tunes.
Thanks to both you and Dennis for stepping up for the 6.5 community.
Didn't the 1994's GM tune clone a DB2?
From what I seen, the 94 and 95 tune files I looked at both mimicked what a DB2's timing curve would most likely be. And the DB2 isn't capable of doing what a DS4 can as far as the timing curve. With the DS4 you can pull the timing WAY down in your spool areas to help drive EGT's up and enhance spool-up, but in the power areas you can raise the timing up so that you can get your 50% timing split that most consider ideal. It is considered to have your timing set so that half your fuel is sprayed in before TDC and the other half after is considered ideal balance of timing and fuel distribution. But in an IDI this 50% can mean some high timing due to pre-cup's and slowed flame travel because of it. A good example is in a stock 6.5 tune file you can see timing numbers up close to 20 degrees at WOT due to the lag of the flame front leaving the pre chamber and entering the main combustion chamber, but in a DURAMAX GM would have the timing set to around 3-4 degrees for the same amount of fuel injected at the same RPM because of the direct injection and less ignition delay.