Apologies for coming in late.
Back to the anode. Agree that it has benefits, although do not see it as a shield in this application. If going this route, I would consider installing a coolant filter and make sure to check the anode as part of regular maintenance.
Sure, the anode will make itself more attractive to stray current so that the metals we want to protect do not take damage. But what happens when it does its job? We get particles (and some gas) in the coolant where the anode will eventually consume itself if there is enough stay current. Put another way, in a sealed coolant system I'd use the anode as an early warning of needing to correct grounds and/or time to change the coolant, and see the protection aspect as a secondary benefit.
Another factor is that installing an anode is also a bit of a gamble due to proximity. On boats this is fairly easy as anode placement is part of the engineering design by slapping one on just about every non-brass metal part that touches water. But for automotive, am not sold that this is part of the thought process (or allowable by the bean counters). Stray current does not float around in the coolant, so the anode needs placement where stray current exists and can find it. This makes placement a strategic guess for the rest of us. So in realty we probably need at least two anodes to provide coverage for both the engine and radiator. Maybe more for the 6.5 as its engine has a bunch of OE ground points.
Just thinking out-loud.
FWIW, completely understand the stray voltage thing as it is part of basic education for boats. For automotive, am convinced that a new-to-me vehicle was victim of poor coolant maintenance which allowed electrolysis to run amok. After fluid changes, first the water pump leaked. Then the radiator. Then the block (along a coolant passage). While that vehicle cost me a whole lot more than planned, it is still less expensive than a new vehicle.