schiker
Well-Known Member
I was rear-ended in a wreck. No injury just damage to my truck. Insurance has been a pain to work with and IMO now lowballing the diminished value.
So I see one of the most common formulas for diminished value is the market value x .1 as max diminished value. then multiplier for milage then multiplier for damage.
The damage multiplier I see goes as:
The insurance company used something like .25 as their multiplier described above as minor damage to structure and panels.
Damage is to a truck bed. The side panel had to be replaced along with the floor/wheel well on that side ( the floor was slightly buckled up at the rear corner where the tailgate closes. Requiring spot welding new side floor panel and side onto the bed. Isn't the floor considered structural or is that only for a unibody? I don't think the new panel seam is good as the factory seam. The bed does look fine from the outside. I don't think it is a bad repair just what is normal.
Shouldn't the damage multiplier be at least 0.5 because the panels were not repairable? Also, I obtained a carfax report and it lists damage as moderate to right-rear and right side of the bed.
What do you think? I would think minor damage would be a dent able to be worked out then only requiring a small amount of body filler to blend body lines. But once a body panel seam was pulled apart and reglued and welded I feel the damage is at least a 0.5 multiplier.
Or do I have it backwards since the panel was replaced it should be like new and they are saying the remaining damage to the seam is a 0.25 multiplier?
If this was a bolt-on body panel I might agree but not a spot welded seam.
Did anyone go to insurance arbitration to argue for a different diminished value?
So I see one of the most common formulas for diminished value is the market value x .1 as max diminished value. then multiplier for milage then multiplier for damage.
The damage multiplier I see goes as:
- 1.00: Severe structural damage
- 0.75: Major damage to structure and panels
- 0.50: Moderate damage to structure and panels
- 0.25: Minor damage to structure and panels
- 0.00: No structural damage or replaced panels
The insurance company used something like .25 as their multiplier described above as minor damage to structure and panels.
Damage is to a truck bed. The side panel had to be replaced along with the floor/wheel well on that side ( the floor was slightly buckled up at the rear corner where the tailgate closes. Requiring spot welding new side floor panel and side onto the bed. Isn't the floor considered structural or is that only for a unibody? I don't think the new panel seam is good as the factory seam. The bed does look fine from the outside. I don't think it is a bad repair just what is normal.
Shouldn't the damage multiplier be at least 0.5 because the panels were not repairable? Also, I obtained a carfax report and it lists damage as moderate to right-rear and right side of the bed.
What do you think? I would think minor damage would be a dent able to be worked out then only requiring a small amount of body filler to blend body lines. But once a body panel seam was pulled apart and reglued and welded I feel the damage is at least a 0.5 multiplier.
Or do I have it backwards since the panel was replaced it should be like new and they are saying the remaining damage to the seam is a 0.25 multiplier?
If this was a bolt-on body panel I might agree but not a spot welded seam.
Did anyone go to insurance arbitration to argue for a different diminished value?