• Welcome to The Truck Stop! We see you haven't REGISTERED yet.

    Your truck knowledge is missing!
    • Registration is FREE , all we need is your birthday and email. (We don't share ANY data with ANYONE)
    • We have tons of knowledge here for your diesel truck!
    • Post your own topics and reply to existing threads to help others out!
    • NO ADS! The site is fully functional and ad free!
    CLICK HERE TO REGISTER!

    Problems registering? Click here to contact us!

    Already registered, but need a PASSWORD RESET? CLICK HERE TO RESET YOUR PASSWORD!

Which truck to get?

Which truck?


  • Total voters
    16

Chief915

915A Maint Tech
Messages
406
Reaction score
1
Location
Cecilia, KY
Been used truck shopping lately and have it narrowed down to 2 candidates. I am torn between the two and need your advice or votes on which one looks better on the surface. As of now, I haven't looked at either truck in person. They are located about 3+ hours from home in oppisite directions. I will of course look them over well before the buy. More or less right now I am looking for advice on which truck to focus on or which one is the better option to go see in your opinions.

I am looking for a diesel truck that will be my daily driver. Every so often, like maybe once every 8 months, tow something light a short distance, less than 100 miles. I am an Army mechanic by trade so I have a lot experience with both the 6.2's and 6.5's. I use to own a 95 C3500 6.5 too that I did all the mods to, ATT, FTB, 4" exhaust, gauges, OPS relay, etc etc. Point being, I am not a stranger or newbie to the 6.2/6.5 arena... I know what to expect out of them lol. The price of each truck is very close to the nada value's and we haven't began negotiating yet, so the price part isn't really a factor for now. Both trucks are GA trucks, so rust shouldn't be an issue on either one. Neither has lived up north or been used as plow trucks in the past.

Let me introduce the candidates.....

1) 1993 GMC K1500 extended cab 6.2L Automatic 219K - Power windows and locks, cruise, tilt, rampage 6 disc cd player, etc. Owner says, for what that's worth, the truck runs great, no mechanical problems. He know's it has a rebuilt jasper engine in it, but he does not know how many miles are on the engine. The 2nd previous owner had the engine replaced somewhere around 2000. The rest of the drivetrain is original. The guy that owns the truck now bought it about a year ago. He recently replaced the starter, alternator, batteries, and water pump. He drives it daily and is more of a small car / motorcycle type of guy so he wants to get rid of the truck for something smaller. He said the interior needs a little work, broken armrest and saggy headliner....nothing major.

2) 1994 Suburban K2500 6.5TD Automatic 220K - Power windows and locks, cd player, etc. Owner says it runs great, hasn't had any problems out of it. He says the injection pump was replaced a couple months ago and cost him $500, but he didn't keep the reciept or anything so unless the pump looks new, who really knows. The engine and drivetrain are original as far as he knows. From one of his pics you can tell it's missing the front bumper. Owner says he has a brush gaurd that is going with the burb in the sale. He had planned on installing the brush gaurd without the bumper. I can hit up the local junk yard for a bumper if need be. No mods are done to the burb. Exhaust is stock, PMD is still in stock location, etc. He said it has a small oil leak and needs oil pan gaskets to fix the leak. Other than that, he hasn't mentioned anything that is broke, worn out, or doesn't work right.


So....what are your thoughts? I am leaning toward one, but I will keep that to myself until some votes and opinions start rolling in.
 

Attachments

  • image (2).jpeg
    image (2).jpeg
    53.6 KB · Views: 6
  • 93 GMC.jpg
    93 GMC.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 10
  • gmc 2.jpg
    gmc 2.jpg
    15.5 KB · Views: 8
  • image (8).jpeg
    image (8).jpeg
    75.3 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
I voted burb just because of the space. But if mileage was a concern then go 6.2. I would love a GMT400 6.2 4x4 for a mpg truck. I am looking at getting an 82 RUNNING 80K mile RED BLOCK 3/4 ton auto 2wd and setting it up for MPG and hauling a 4 wheeler. I plan to lift my 95 in the furture (fun truck and want a smaller fuel friendly replacement when I do that.
 
Passanger space isn't really a concern. We could all fit in the truck if needed. Yea, we would fit more comfortably in the suburban, but we have a family vehicle already for that. The burb or truck would be my daily driver to work, parts store runs, junk yard shopping, etc. In an emergency, the family would fit in either option.
 
Im assuming no turbo on the 6.2.

Im partial to the burb and the EFI, but a non-turbo 6.2 will likely net you greater mileage, realizing it wont be nearly as capable as a the turbo burb when set up right. The recent maintenance of electrical sounds somewhat concerning, but maybe its good now.

Luckily they should have the same awesome captains chairs for a nice ride. The Burb will have an L65 engine setup and beefier suspension and brakes, vs the EGR setup on the 1/2 ton.
 
Keep looking unless the price is very low on the burb.
Wheel covers missing on the 1993 means a past owner didn't give it a good damn. It will be a parts black hole from neglect.

Burb has a bumper missing - Wreck of some sort. Miles, oil leak, you know what that means on a 6.5 - worn bearings ate a oil seal at worst best just a leaky oil filter adapter or cooler lines.
 
All good points so far, I appriciate it.

I was a little concerned with the bumper missing on the burb too. Not so much that it's missing I guess, like I said I can find one in a JY.... my concern was WHY is it missing?

I did not notice the, what appears to be extensive rust, on the 93..especially on the driver's side..... Great catch tanman.

As of this post, the vote is split 3 to 3..... Keep the votes and thoughts coming.

Thanks again guys
 
I voted burb. It looks "cleaner", a little better "kept" When i buy vehicles mechanical issues are nothing, i can fix those. But rust is the first turn off for me.. But if you dont need a jigantic burb, and your family can fit in a truck, id keep looking for a truck in better condition. Sounds like you would tow very little, so the NA for mileage would be better. When i tow i tow a boat load, so i need the turbo.
 
I voted burb. It looks "cleaner", a little better "kept" When i buy vehicles mechanical issues are nothing, i can fix those. But rust is the first turn off for me.. But if you dont need a jigantic burb, and your family can fit in a truck, id keep looking for a truck in better condition. Sounds like you would tow very little, so the NA for mileage would be better. When i tow i tow a boat load, so i need the turbo.

The 6.2 gave better mileage than the 6.5?? Very much??



Sent from my iPod Touch using Tapatalk, as if anybody actually gave a sh!t if it was a desktop, laptop, crackberry, I-phone or freakin' morse code or for that matter smoke signals... :)
 
Some of the older NA 6.2 trucks could get 23+ mpg consistently. Granted most were likely 3.08 or 3.42 gears. However 3.73s with tall tires aint bad
 
The 6.5 would be nice to have, just for the turbo. :)

Probably cheaper than a Dmax if it needs work too, eh??



Sent from my iPod Touch using Tapatalk, as if anybody actually gave a sh!t if it was a desktop, laptop, crackberry, I-phone or freakin' morse code or for that matter smoke signals... :)
 
The 6.5 would be nice to have, just for the turbo. :)

Probably cheaper than a Dmax if it needs work too, eh??



Sent from my iPod Touch using Tapatalk, as if anybody actually gave a sh!t if it was a desktop, laptop, crackberry, I-phone or freakin' morse code or for that matter smoke signals... :)

Much cheaper...
 
but that 6.2 engine/block is probably in better shape right now with newer rebuilt engine never been turbo'd than the 6.5 turbo. Since we tend to abuse turbo diesels and the 6.5 isnt good for that for very long. Assuming it was a good rebuilt 6.2, if its a 599 6.2 block then its a nice find.

So if thinking of putting another turbo on anyway, could mod the 6.2 with +.01 turbo gaskets, head studs, turbo manifolds/exhaust and go. With that exception of needing some sort of spacer on the passenger side turbo manifold.
 
I wouldnt give a dime for that pickup. Not a n/a fan to begin with, and I wouldn't spen the money to convert that truck to a turbo. You're talking a lot of money, probably more than the truck is worth. I've seen trucks likethat sell for under a grand. The miles are too high for a truck built on half ton chassis. Everything is light duty and replaced 13 times already. Whatever hasn't been replaced is going to be worn out. I say let it go to the scrap yard.

The Sub is 3 times the truck that the 1500 pickup is. Big tranny, big rear axle, turbo motor, big springs, bearings, and so on. I'd be a little leery about 220k and would probably pass on it. But, if it passed your up-close visual inspection then it may be worth it to you. They are so rare I'd give it a second chance. Plus I'm a little biased, I just got a 6.5 Sub K2500 and so far I love driving it. It rides like a car compared to my 97 3500, but it rides like a truck compared to my wifes 01 1500 Suburban. Just enough truckish ride to make me comfortable.

I'm voting for the Suburban.
 
Back
Top