Pillow
Recruit
For a background of this issue please refer to this thread: http://www.thetruckstop.us/forum/sh...Pump-delete-Question...&highlight=belt+length
In summary, there has been some debate over the issue of belt lifespan after removal of the vacuum pump. In other words, eating the belt due to lack of belt control with less retaining channels in the pulleys.
Previously I have run a stock GM pulley (broached and with control channels on the pulley) with the vacuum pump removed. No problems on two different trucks over 50K miles.
Recently I changed the belt tensioner on the Burb and have eaten two belts in short order... The tensioner I am using is the Dayco "no-slack" unit PN 89213 which does not have control channels built into the pulley.
Needless to say, tonight the GM unit will be put back into service!
In summary, there has been some debate over the issue of belt lifespan after removal of the vacuum pump. In other words, eating the belt due to lack of belt control with less retaining channels in the pulleys.
Previously I have run a stock GM pulley (broached and with control channels on the pulley) with the vacuum pump removed. No problems on two different trucks over 50K miles.
Recently I changed the belt tensioner on the Burb and have eaten two belts in short order... The tensioner I am using is the Dayco "no-slack" unit PN 89213 which does not have control channels built into the pulley.
Needless to say, tonight the GM unit will be put back into service!