QinVB
Member
Several months ago the inet was full of enthusiasm for deleting the vacuum pump(VP) on 6.5 TD engines when they crapped out like mine just did. Now the consensus seems to be that it's better to replace, and keep, the VP for several reasons - better fuel mileage, engine longevity, "that's the way it was designed and meant to be", etc.
So what is the best way to go? Cost is comparable. Actually I can replace the VP for less than the cost of eliminating it, unless I make a home made turbo master style controller and get a good deal on a 99.9" serp belt, but add in the boost gauge and it's close to the same cost; close enough to do the VP if that is the wise thing to do. This truck has to last and be trouble free. That's why I'm doing all this preventative work on it. I can't afford to replace it. If I could I wouldn't have bought a $1275.00 dollar truck. I have a good foundation, I just want to build on it, not hot rod it up and break it somewhere down the line. I'll be 70 soon and I'm not really enjoying doing mechanical work in my driveway anymore, and it's getting colder. So - what's better long range???
Fermanator - would appreciate your input on this.
So what is the best way to go? Cost is comparable. Actually I can replace the VP for less than the cost of eliminating it, unless I make a home made turbo master style controller and get a good deal on a 99.9" serp belt, but add in the boost gauge and it's close to the same cost; close enough to do the VP if that is the wise thing to do. This truck has to last and be trouble free. That's why I'm doing all this preventative work on it. I can't afford to replace it. If I could I wouldn't have bought a $1275.00 dollar truck. I have a good foundation, I just want to build on it, not hot rod it up and break it somewhere down the line. I'll be 70 soon and I'm not really enjoying doing mechanical work in my driveway anymore, and it's getting colder. So - what's better long range???
Fermanator - would appreciate your input on this.