FellowTraveler
Well-Known Member
My Burb seems to go through upper balls rather quickly 'they are MOOG problem solvers too.' This has me wondering if it's the control arm angle causing the what I suspect is pre-mature wear...anyway the suspension is the 8.6k+ 'meaning the front torsion bars are one (1) step under the max bar capacity GM used in the GMT400 platform' the bars are not cranked and within GM spec for angle.
The big question; 'could the upper control arm angle at the ball joint mounting surface limit the amount of travel stressing the ball joint?' I see upper and lower travel limiters and bushing at top and suspect even though travel is restricted the angle of the upper control arm maybe too steep stressing the joint, 'just guessing here.'
This brings me to the aftermarket "anyone know of any after market tube type upper control arms that may have a better angle at the ball joint?"
The big question; 'could the upper control arm angle at the ball joint mounting surface limit the amount of travel stressing the ball joint?' I see upper and lower travel limiters and bushing at top and suspect even though travel is restricted the angle of the upper control arm maybe too steep stressing the joint, 'just guessing here.'
This brings me to the aftermarket "anyone know of any after market tube type upper control arms that may have a better angle at the ball joint?"